Skip to content
Jackpot Project

Advocacy Collective Asserts to Have Extracted Millions of Audio Files from Spotify

A digital rights group has stated to have scraped a vast number of songs from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers noted the apparent leak could boost AI companies searching for material to develop their technology.

A group called Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and album names. The company, which carries more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its full inventory.

“We have located and deactivated the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access found a third party collected public metadata and used questionable tactics to bypass DRM protections.

Archive's Declared Mission and Worries

The streaming service does not think the music taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, remarked the breached music would probably be used for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced data is unfortunately widespread in the AI industry, so this accessed music is almost certain to be used training AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to LibGen, a vast online archive of copyrighted books that has allegedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to train its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in principle “create their own personal free version of Spotify”. He added it could also enable technology firms to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Responses

In the UK, artists and writers have protested against a government proposal to allow AI companies utilize protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for science, research and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.

NY
Written by

Nicole York

Elena Ashford is a freelance writer and storyteller passionate about uncovering hidden gems in everyday life.

Jackpot Project

Type to search articles.